Ontology. The nature of being.
The definition of Is. The word for 'being.'
A fish doesn't think about what it is, how well it swims, whether it's swimming for the right reasons. It simply swirls and darts through the water, doing what it knows how to do.
A daisy doesn't think about what it is, how it compares to the other daisies, whether it's growing tall enough, whether it's soaking in the sunshine for the right reasons. It simply grows and blossoms, doing what comes next, doing what it knows how to do.
When Robb was alive, we had a chocolate lab: Molly. Molly was pretty much exclusively Robb's dog, although she and I did okay as roommates. We each belonged to Robb, and when he traveled, we often wished he would come home and make the other one be nice.
Molly slobbered a whole lot. Her energy always exceeded mine, and often the bounds of our home. Molly was a busy girl, a most joyful chocolate. I used to get frustrated with her for the wet slobber, for the following at my heels, for the exuberant and desperate attempts at getting everyone to love life just as much as she did.
But Molly didn't know how to do anything else. It was her ontology. It's who she was. And sometimes I wondered if she brought glory to God in her exuberant, spilling joy. He made her that way. If a sunset can bring glory to him, simply by lighting up the sky in the only way it can, then certainly a chocolate labrador can too.
As people with the ability to think, we have the ability to study ontology. To think about the nature of being. We matter to ourselves, but only in relation to whether we matter to someone else, something else.
The people in my life establish my ontology, the fact that I am, the fact that I matter. Our response to others, first of all God, defines our being.
And this can really muck things up. I think we can think too much and perhaps make it something it wasn't supposed to be.
(Ha. Play on words right there: making ontology something it wasn't supposed to be. Oh, words... how I love you.)
To simply be, to do what is next, can seem irresponsible. Where's the 'better' in that?
We read, "Be still and know that I am God." We also read, "Be holy as I am holy." Be still; be holy.
What is ontology as glory? Is this the concept of doing what is next, of living in the moment, of simply being fully present?
What is ontology as sin? Is this perhaps the process of overthinking and thereby never doing?
As artists, if we are honest, we can question if what we love to do, what we can create, what we enjoy most, can really be worshipful. If it's this much fun, if I love it this much, then where is the sacrifice? Where is the humility?
We can become paralyzed by the worry that perhaps this is too much fun or too easy and therefore we are doing it for the wrong reasons.
Humility is like integrity - it is gone as soon as one can hold it in her hands.
To think too much about humility is to embrace too much of my ontology. My ability to simply be.
I contend a different approach: Stop overthinking it. Just do what you must do in order to truly be. Worship is a state of being.
And do it well, with your whole heart, with excellence.